Page 1 of 1
EDUARD Distributor Leaflet April 2025
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2025 2:58 am
by mostrich
Kamikaze? Only as a couple!
April Leaflet
Re: EDUARD Distributor Leaflet April 2025
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2025 3:01 am
by Stuart
Some interesting stuff.
I know it sounds daft given that we all spend our time building war-machines, and things that kill people, but I find the thought of building a Kamikaze aircraft rather unsettling - it just seems a bit 'in poor taste'.
Re: EDUARD Distributor Leaflet April 2025
Posted: Wed Apr 16, 2025 9:26 am
by Stikpusher
The Spitfire II does oook nice…

Re: EDUARD Distributor Leaflet April 2025
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2025 7:18 am
by mostrich
Stuart wrote: ↑Wed Apr 16, 2025 3:01 am
Some interesting stuff.
I know it sounds daft given that we all spend our time building war-machines, and things that kill people, but I find the thought of building a Kamikaze aircraft rather unsettling - it just seems a bit 'in poor taste'.
Right with you on that.
Re: EDUARD Distributor Leaflet April 2025
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2025 2:13 pm
by BlackSheep214
Re: EDUARD Distributor Leaflet April 2025
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2025 5:46 pm
by Stuart
I didn't say I find building war machines unsettling Tom, far from it, I was just pointing out the irony that whilst I'm happy to build models of things that kill people (including nuclear weapons), I find the thought of building a suicide aircraft unsettling - it's daft I know.
I do take your point about them thinking they were having a honourable death though, misguided as that was. They were certainly fanatical.
Oh, and some of us were there in September 1939

Re: EDUARD Distributor Leaflet April 2025
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 3:29 am
by mostrich
Yeah. Ask Lyle.

Re: EDUARD Distributor Leaflet April 2025
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2025 4:45 pm
by BlackSheep214
No biggie and it's all good. I may have interpreted differently to the comments.

Re: EDUARD Distributor Leaflet April 2025
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2025 6:40 pm
by Stuart
BlackSheep214 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 18, 2025 4:45 pm
No biggie and it's all good. I may have interpreted differently to the comments.
I have to say though that the choice of scheme doesn't alter the fact that the Zero is a cracking looking aircraft.