So why WWII Single Engine Fighters..?

Talk about anything modeling: kits, tools, paint, etc...
User avatar
Stuart
Elite Member
Posts: 11924
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 1:06 pm
Location: North Wales

So why WWII Single Engine Fighters..?

Post by Stuart »

Ok the old Atmosphere has been getting a bit heavy around here recently :bored:

So it's time for another one of :quotes: Portmans Pointless Discussion Threads (TM) :quotes: :grin:

One thing I like about SPAM is that we have quite an interesting mix of types/kits being built here. BUT, as we all know the most popular modelling subject (as far as aircraft go anyway) has got to be WWII Single Engine Fighters (SEF).

I would bet that if most of us if we took a look at our display cases - WWII SEF would feature quite heavily (I know they do in mine)

Why?

What is it about these type of aircraft that get us building them is such huge nunbers? Why do you build them? - and go on - what's your favorite WWII SEF kit/build? (Share some pic's!)

Cheers!

Stuart
Stuart Templeton 'I may not be good but I'm slow...'
User avatar
mostrich
Admin
Posts: 3110
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:13 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re: So why WWII Single Engine Fighters..?

Post by mostrich »

Maybe it's the old human weakness for one-on-one fights. It's what made hundreds of Hollywood movies popular: Good (Allies) against evil (Axis). Soldier against soldier is recognized as more knightly as the bombing campaigns.

Another point may be the sleak lines of a fighter. Just a 'it looks cool so I'll build it' -affection.

-Torben
Cheers,
Torben
User avatar
lawman56
Advanced Member
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:19 pm
Location: Just this side of insanity....

Re: So why WWII Single Engine Fighters..?

Post by lawman56 »

Personally, it's more of a supply vs. demand thing. My aircraft builds are 99% of the time in 1/32 scale, so just the smaller fighters, (ie: 109, Hellcat, etc...), still take up a decent chunk of real estate on my shelves. Since SEF's tend to be most popular, that's what I build.

I do have a 1/32 B-17G and B-25H that I'll be building, (eventually :whistle: ), but I have to build display cases into my model railroad layout supports to do it. Provided they work well, I'll probably add a few more multi-engines.

My favorite WWII fighter is the P-38, and will get one at some point, but that's probably the largest I can put on a shelf economically.

Could thier popularity be due to the "normalcy" aviation plays in society today? Prior to, and up to WWII, pilots were daring adrenaline junkies, aircraft had 2 wings and sputtering, potentially fatal, engines.

Once everything kicked off, the world went from biplanes to jets in roughly 5-8 years. Remarkable.

Now, when the US tests a new aircraft, I'm really not interested. Just another highly expensive jet. :bored:
Joe

Illegitimi Non Carborundum
User avatar
Thomas_M
Admin
Posts: 4244
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 9:43 am
Location: Bad Wurzach - Germany
Contact:

Re: So why WWII Single Engine Fighters..?

Post by Thomas_M »

Nice and calming topic, Port! :whistle:

I guess that SEF are mostly fighters, so they have a kind of s... appeal for modellers. Space also is a point to mention. But I also like my Monogram B-24 and B-17, B-29 (2x) and others. In the end, for me, it is a mood thing.
User avatar
LyleW
Admin
Posts: 15037
Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 7:25 am
Location: Mt. Washington KY

Re: So why WWII Single Engine Fighters..?

Post by LyleW »

Really good question. I don't know. Sort of like solving world hunger. If I knew, I'd be rich and famous. Instead, I'm just brilliant and good looking. :bag:

Supply and demand definitely played a role - kits from my youth played a role (good or bad, I bought what the local drug store had on the shelf). In the larger-than-braille scales, probably price plays a role and as Thomas said they are sexy to have sitting around. Something sadly lacking in the new generation of jets.

Fun topic to kick around.
To make each build less crappy than the last one. Or, put another way, "Better than the last one, not as good as the next one!"..
User avatar
Manny1943
Addicted Member
Posts: 1293
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 1:38 pm

Re: So why WWII Single Engine Fighters..?

Post by Manny1943 »

Cause they're cool and shit... :FM:
User avatar
BlackSheep214
Elite Member
Posts: 13440
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2014 8:47 pm

Re: So why WWII Single Engine Fighters..?

Post by BlackSheep214 »

lawman56 wrote:I do have a 1/32 B-17G and B-25H that I'll be building, (eventually :whistle: ), but I have to build display cases into my model railroad layout supports to do it. Provided they work well, I'll probably add a few more multi-engines.
Wait... just how big are these 1/32 bombers going to be when built? I assuming the wingspan has to be at least 4 feet wingtip to wingtip?
“Who controls the skies, controls the fate of this Earth”

Author unknown- 352nd Fighter Group, Blue-Nosed Bastards of Bodney

“Send one plane it’s a sortie; send two planes it’s a flight; send four planes it’s a test of airpower. - Richard Kohn
User avatar
Paul
Addicted Member
Posts: 1069
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 9:09 am
Location: Under your bed, muwahahahaha

Re: So why WWII Single Engine Fighters..?

Post by Paul »

I have loved these fighters since I was a sprout. Even though Dad was a ground pounder in the corps he knew all those planes by heart hence I think they are cool. Bombers and other multi-engine planes are just as cool but building them to me is bordering on boredom because of all the redundancy in the building, I am talking engines here.
I like jets just as well but if I build one then finishing it will be a miraculous.
Image
User avatar
lawman56
Advanced Member
Posts: 478
Joined: Sat Apr 12, 2014 2:19 pm
Location: Just this side of insanity....

Re: So why WWII Single Engine Fighters..?

Post by lawman56 »

Wait... just how big are these 1/32 bombers going to be when built? I assuming the wingspan has to be at least 4 feet wingtip to wingtip?

The B-17G has wingspan of roughly 36 inches. The B-25H around 18. So I need a wee bit of room. :tongue:
Joe

Illegitimi Non Carborundum
User avatar
Stikpusher
Moderator
Posts: 21222
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 8:37 pm
Location: Ceti Alpha 5

Re: So why WWII Single Engine Fighters..?

Post by Stikpusher »

Part of it is their history, part of it is their look, part of it is availability/affordability, part of it is the display space that they take up. But I know that I still have more armor builds than I do of WWII SEFs. Plus 1/48 helos, plus 1/48 jets... and a slowly growing number of ships & subs...
"Surely I have made my meaning plain? I intend to avenge myself upon you, Admiral. I have deprived your ship of power, and when I swing 'round, I intend to deprive you of your life."

FLSM
Post Reply

Return to “Modeling Discussion”