Page 2 of 9

Re: Eduard's 109 G-6

Posted: Tue May 27, 2014 7:56 am
by Medicman71
GWH did that F-15B/D just recently that the shapes were off on some areas. GWH took note and fixed them.

Re: Eduard's 109 G-6

Posted: Tue May 27, 2014 12:05 pm
by Thomas_M
Brett Green has updated his assessment in regards to possible shape issues: Bf 109 on HyperScale

Re: Eduard's 109 G-6

Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 9:07 pm
by lawdog114
Issues aside. I'm all over this turkey if I can get it cheap down the line. I can live with the inaccuracies and I'm confident it will look like a 109 when done. I do however have 10+ Hasegawa 109's in the stash I have to get through first. I wish Eduard would give us subjects we really need though, such as a new P-40B/C or even the Merlin F/L variants. I think we have enough 109's IMO....

I must admit taunting via social media is un-called-for though. If it wasn't for us, they would be out of business yeah? Getting to big for their britches perhaps?

Joe

Re: Eduard's 109 G-6

Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:26 pm
by AIRFIXER
Vladimir Sulc, Eduard's CEO, commented the G-6 issues in his editorial of the latest issue of Info Eduard:
http://www.eduard.com/store/out/media/I ... 4-06EN.pdf
[...]
I am sure we will find a solution to these issues, and we will have these corrections implemented
for the boxings which will follow the Royal Class edition.

[...]

Re: Eduard's 109 G-6

Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 12:26 pm
by Medicman71
Well at least they admitted to making the mistake. Good for them. But how did they let it get through the quality control process?

Re: Eduard's 109 G-6

Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2014 1:13 pm
by Medicman71
Well I had no plans on buying that kit anyway.